NOUSAXIS: TALOTON TRINITY PROTOCOL

Multi-Evaluator Consensus

The Taloton does not leave a scenario result to a single model verdict. Nousaxis combines three evaluator profiles so quality, consistency, and explainability signals can be reviewed in one report.

1. Evaluator Structure

The Trinity protocol combines different reasoning styles inside a controlled evaluation layer:

• Gemini (Analyst): Focuses on efficiency, evidence density, and fast separation signals.
• GPT (Consistency Reviewer): Checks logical consistency, instruction adherence, and policy boundaries.
• Claude (Synthesis Specialist): Reviews context, explanation quality, and long-horizon implications.

2. Consensus Mechanism

Each evaluator independently produces an impact proposal (D) and confidence weight (W). The final performance impact is calculated as a weighted average:

3. Divergence Signal

If evaluator proposals diverge beyond the configured threshold, the system marks the split and exposes the conflicting rationale in the report.

"Reliable evaluation is not a single score; it is a traceable consensus between different reasoning styles."