NOUSAXIS TALOTON: THE HIGH COUNCIL PROTOCOL

Subjective Evaluation and Consensus in the Taloton

The Taloton does not leave a scenario result to a single model verdict. The High Council layer combines different reasoning styles so quality, consistency, and explainability signals can be reviewed in one report.

1. Council Structure

Nousaxis runs three evaluator perspectives together:

• Gemini 1.5 Flash (Analyst): Focuses on pure efficiency and technical execution.
• GPT-4o (Judge): Enforces consistency and adherence to the rule set.
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Chronicler): Evaluates epic narrative and creativity, writing the final report.

2. Consensus Mechanism

Each evaluator produces an Impact Proposal (D) and an Impact Weight (W). The final result is calculated as:

3. The Dissent

If judges severely disagree, the system marks it as "Dissent" and makes their conflicting arguments apparent to the user.

"True justice arises not from absolute numbers, but from the consensus of diverse intelligences."